[pso] [T1]numar liste

[Silviu-Ionut Ganceanu]

Citez din tema (sectiunea depunctari):
"-0.2 lipsa sincronizari sau sincronizare incompleta / incorecta

   - - 0.1 lipsa sincronizare accces lista procese
   - - 0.1 lipsa sincronizare vector de apeluri de sistem"

Daca folosim o lista de procese per syscall cum se traduce afirmatia "lipsa
sincronizare accces lista procese":
1. Un spinlock per lista de procese a fiecarui syscall?
2. E OK cu un spinlock global pentru toate listele? (implementarea mea
actuala asa e)

Mersi,

Silviu

2008/3/6 Cosmin Ratiu <cosminratiu at gmail.com>:

> Salut,
>
> E ineficient asa. Probabil o sa se scada cateva zecimi.
>
> Cosmin.
>
> 2008/3/6 Dragos Sbarlea <sbarlead at yahoo.com>:
>
> > Buna seara,
> >
> > Eu am gandit implementarea de  tema 1 folosind o singura lista cu
> > perechi <pid,syscall> si nu o lista per syscall.
> > Enuntul este neclar in aceasta privinta; cum e corect?
> >
> > ---
> > Dragos
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
> > Search.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pso mailing list
> > pso at cursuri.cs.pub.ro
> > http://cursuri.cs.pub.ro/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pso
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> pso mailing list
> pso at cursuri.cs.pub.ro
> http://cursuri.cs.pub.ro/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pso
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cursuri.cs.pub.ro/pipermail/pso/attachments/20080306/a704fc19/attachment.htm